The authors have been thinking, for a while now, that the female end of the spectrum (Fspect) may be more prone to bonding via fetishism (Fh) due to the social component lead in their drive. The literature, however, does not bear this out.
(*though = to Mspect in S&M play. This culture has been mainstreamed by a large degree, accounting for some of this).
The Mspect still tie much back through the sexual systems, even in obscure or specific Fh. That is not to bypass the social in Mspect, it is certainly a large part – up to e50%.
But Mspect can drive operate without much else ie e90% drive pure (1h3) .
Where as Fspect are concerned, in the author’s opinion, it can not be successfully argued this is virtually ever the majority explanation.
Anything can ultimately be associated with anything. However, a key indicator of 1h4 lead that it would be negligent to overlook in DDX, is q orgasm focused or not?
This doesn’t invalidate Fspect sex drive in any way, merely more specifically defines it as falling in the latter tiers of the Tristream, almost all of the time.
Tristream of Drive
Under Ekawa, the Tristream of drive falls into:
1. Drive Pure (1H03);
2. Drive Sensual (1H04) [BioSocPsy intimacy fx can be 1H03 independent];
3. The Social Hexagram:
Tier I (3H04, 05 & C predominate);
– [Inc safety/”hug” fx, & pure manipulation for social goods or access];
& Social Hexagram Tier II (3H01,02,03);
-[Status “They are a singer/lawyer/model/doctor/just hot as perceived by friends/cult leader or status in social in-group – generally “I need to keep them/ tell my friends about it, how they chose me.
– Also social pressure to marry, Bio-Soc drive contact ie Bio-Loneliness enforced fx from social species research, or powerful BioSoc for babies switch].
-Out-group in-group (belong by not belonging).
Posit Sq Gen-Pop x-bar
The stream b not viewed in a vacuum, they each inform the other, however:
~ Mspect, especially youth, 1H4 dominate or “link through” in all. Comprise ~50-90%
~Fspect ~75% drawn from the Social Hexagram, especially Tier I & NonBio initiated Tier II
~ Past always informs.
~ Habituation & boredom inform.
It was tried for the longest time to level drive for the sake of equality – but it is simply a manifest fact at this stage that drive pure equates to a jumping point in the spectrum threshold.
There are exceptions to every rule, & situational & lifestyle factors which all feed in. However, what is traditionally thought of a drive is Mspect dominant.
Guys thinking with their “little” brain between their legs is a cliche for a reason. & whether soc conditioning impacted chemical production (which is likely – to a degree), it is insufficient to call the playing field even close to level at this point.
Plausibility Informs Arousal
Why the secretary/naughty nurse/maid/teacher? Because in all fantasy, plausibility informs arousal.
Not likelihood. Plausibility. Why police or military? Because it is plausible to be arrested & bad lieutenant’d or run into duty defence officers who can (& do) get away with sexual domination.
Why the postman or milkman? Because they USE to come to the house – plausibility.
Why uniforms? Cross association from school days & the above. Why youth? Because it runs against death – the 1H3 tg’s this.
Sub-Foci
1) Taboo effects for liberation (LibTab), control restoration of past abuse, pre full flashback trigger memory pain suppression.
2) Early exposure blue prints cf reinforcement
3) Submission with safety (ie powerful people get to relax – but have still not let go completely)
4) Control Over – rarer it seems, but making people feel, safety of power. Both 3 & 4 deal with 1h4 fx, less personal control required or performance anxiety. May be 1h3 dominant, but mostly in Mspect.
5) Mask – role to be away from self for freedom to explore, new “self baptism”, forgiveness, or inclusion in new in-group from: furry to… – all of them.
6) DLN – “do you still love me now ” effects (DLN) ie “what if I do THIS!”. This is spectrumed throughout relationships, from stealing, spending, cheating, drug abuse. But in the sexual too.
7) Abstractions (guilt, specific emotio hx encoded explorations into past of lib/tab, or reclaiming). Early programing is difficult to undo – insight alone does not achieve this. 7 is a bit of a catch all for unexpected results so they are not excluded should they be required for future research.
All follow rules of inclusion by exclusion, social learning & reinforcement effects.
Any specific case is of course mixed & ultimately fluid; but anchored at the base event or past experience & generally held in the pattern of the above 7.
Baby-ism, for example, is not just “take care of me”, Freudian-esk give me the bottle I never had a child (Hex tier 1 – “hugs”) but also DLN. Scatological is another case in point. Gay use to be highly DLN, though is far less so now.
Indeed, much of parapphil, Fspect especially, run on a DLN (though Fspect are significantly rarer across paraphils).
Mspect, however, are far more likely to 1h3 link all Fh, despite other factors. This is a key reason (though not only reason) for the Fspect discrepancies across paraphils report numbers.
However, literature politely downplays this seemingly misogynistic indicator.
Let it be posited that just because an indicator may be interpreted as misogynistic (& there are, no question, equality issues that abound today’s society) – that does not mean the Mspect, & even classical morphology, 1H3 driver is not dominant in these cases.
Counterpoint on this point is difficult to find credible. Though people in all courts love to argue it. The author tried to force a flat spectrum for a long time too; it simply is not a tenable position at this time.
Specific paraphils, how base bondage became “mainstream”, & general behaviours under this paradigm shall also be discussed.
…
J(J)R-P1H3rf-14/M05-24/brchfce-smfvr
Chronicle of Codes 